• latest news
  • Car tech
  • Cell phones and smartphones
  • Computers and hardware
  • Digital photo and video
  • Gadgets
  • Gaming
  • Green tech
  • Home theater
  • MP3 and portable video players
  • Televisions
• awards
  • Best of CES
  • People's voice
• video
• photos

About me

My posting summary

1 to 2 of 2

My comments

• If all the above explanations are true, than it proves my point. We average morons need a reference book to explain the sources for those names (since no sane person would intentionally ask You.) At least IE versions stayed logical -- obviously different folks doing the naming. In reply to: "Live blog: Ballmer at CES"

  January 7, 2009

  0 replies

• 3.1,95,98,ME,2000,XP,Vista, and now "7". A meaningless naming system, unless its intentionally meant to confuse, is unexplainable. Ever since 3.1, - with no 3.0, 2.0, or 1.0, I've watched with amazement as the names kept being off-the-wall and illogical. These titles will not create a legacy but a hodge-podge. In reply to: "Live blog: Ballmer at CES"

  January 7, 2009

  2 replies