Version: 2008

Neo Con's community profile

About me

My posting summary

  • Comments: 151
1 to 10 of 151
Sort by: Show results per page

My comments

  • Yawn. In reply to: "802.11n Wi-Fi standard finally approved"

    September 13, 2009

    0 replies

  • That's right, gbnm. You and your 1984 references are so racist. How dare you question our great and noble leader? Maybe you should write an essay on how you can help the President. Or why two legs are good and four legs are bad. Hey, if 2 + 2 = 5, then maybe a 2 trillion dollar/year deficit is really a surplus?! In reply to: "Say no to the supersized TV, EPA hints"

    September 9, 2009

    0 replies

  • pentest, why is that not sustainable? It's perfectly sustainable if we keep drilling for our own oil and building more oil-fired, coal-fired and nuclear power plants. "Well, we can't just keep doing that," you say. Why not? Why the hell not? We've got plenty of energy under the earth just waiting for us to get it and use it. It's only the backwards-thinking, energy fascists who refuse to allow society to keep moving forward and keep sustaining our way of life. Nothing's stopping us but the morons. In reply to: "Say no to the supersized TV, EPA hints"

    September 9, 2009

    0 replies

  • Thanks, duketg. I'll choose to think for myself and spend my money any way I please because it's none of anyone else's ******* business. They can pry my 65" TV out of my cold, dead hands. In reply to: "Say no to the supersized TV, EPA hints"

    September 9, 2009

    0 replies

  • Cary1, my carbon footprint does not affect you one bit. Get your head out of your rear end and start thinking for yourself. [CNET editors' note: Personal attack deleted.] In reply to: "Say no to the supersized TV, EPA hints"

    September 9, 2009

    0 replies

  • Wow, BogusBasin. That's just weird. Is the Microsoft vs. Apple thing political now? Microsoft supporters are conservative and Apple supporters are liberal? That's a new one on me. Very random, with no basis in anything, and just plain weird. In reply to: "Microsoft workers seek Office suggestions"

    August 12, 2009

    0 replies

  • Hey, why not? We've already hamstrung our military personnel. Why not make military robots that refuse to shoot or bombs that refuse to blow up? That'll keep the terrorists quaking in their turbins. In reply to: "Q&A: Robotics engineer aims to give robots a humane touch"

    July 8, 2009

    2 replies

  • Hmmm... well, ralf, since the orphanage is where they get their kids to strap bombs to in the first place, wouldn't blowing up the orphanage kill many of their potential weapons? Sounds like a good trade-off to me. In reply to: "Q&A: Robotics engineer aims to give robots a humane touch"

    July 8, 2009

    0 replies

  • Thank goodness they mentioned the mercury. No discussion involving CF lightbulbs is complete without mention of the deadly, deadly mercury inside each and every one. No death bulbs will ever enter my house. I'm bothered by the fact that my office has DB's installed.

    It's excellent that American innovation has once again overcome government stupidity. I bet private industry even created at least 1 job for every 2.2 jobs destroyed by this idiotic California legislation, just like every hidden tax those morons dream up.

    July 6, 2009

    5 replies

  • You go Myles. Microsoft? Who ever heard of that company? They are so irrelevant. Who cares what their CEO thinks? Now excuse me while I go back to my cave... In reply to: "Ballmer, IBM reportedly surprised by Oracle-Sun deal"

    April 20, 2009

    4 replies