January 8, 2008 11:20 AM PST

Seagate CEO: Blu-ray won the battle but lost the war

LAS VEGAS--The winner in the Blu-ray and HD DVD war is the hard drive, according to Bill Watkins, CEO of Seagate Technology.

"People are saying Blu-ray won the war but who cares? The war is over physical distribution versus electrical distribution, and Blu-ray and HD lost that," he said during a breakfast meeting at the Consumer Electronics Show here this week. "In this, flash memory and hard drives are on the same side. The war is over and the physical guys lost."

Bill Watkins

Bill Watkins

(Credit: Seagate)

Watkins, naturally, speaks from personal interest, but he's got a point. (A former Army grunt and a decades-long Deadhead, Watkins is also one of the more entertaining CEOs in the technology industry to interview.) Consumers haven't been buying Blu-ray or HD DVD players and by the time they do, technology companies will likely be hawking sophisticated on-demand services and Internet Protocol TV. IPTV, in fact, is the dominant theme of the show. Sharp, Samsung, and Panasonic all unfurled content alliances that will let consumers look at headlines or videos from the Net on their TVs.

That's good news for Seagate, because electronic distribution means more hard drive sales. "If (data) is in the cloud I get more storage sales because you have to back up everything," he said.

"Surveillance is a big deal," he added. "You're being filmed right now (we were in a casino) and they've got to store it somewhere."

Hard drive makers are right now living through good times. In the 1990s, excess manufacturing capacity and price cuts led to stagnant revenues and losses for many companies. Since then, many players have dropped out. New markets such as digital video recorders opened up for drive makers. As a result, both Seagate and rival Western Digital are seeing double-digit growth. Seagate has already upped its revenue guidance twice for the quarter that just ended.

And the future continues to look good. Hollywood, Watkins said, will have no choice but to get into home delivery of content in a big way. People are leaving home less and less. And if the movie studios don't deliver their content to their home, people will watch whatever they can find on the Internet. At CES, XStreamHD is showing off a box that gets on-demand movies from a satellite. Actor Michael Douglas is an investor.

"They will watch lousy content if it is easy to do," he said.

Other notes from Watkins:

•  Seagate doesn't have its solid state drive out yet, but it's coming.

•  Flash memory, he added, will never completely take over the hard drive market. The demand for storage is too big. If a flash maker wanted to provide just 15 percent of the world's market for storage in 2012, it would have to invest $50 billion this year alone.

"And right now, no one has made that investment," he said.

He further argued that flash memory gets too much attention from Wall Street. "I'm making 75 cents a quarter, and I get half the valuation of SanDisk or Micron," he added.

•  Consumers still seem buoyant in Europe and Asia, so a lengthy, full-blown global recession may not occur. Admittedly, he adds, that's his own spin.

•  America has got to reform its immigration laws by letting in more immigrants. Nearly 60 percent of the companies in Silicon Valley were founded by people born outside the U.S. Last year, close to 70 percent of the students getting Ph.D.s in engineering were from other countries.

"And none of them got a green card," he said. "Because of this, U.S. companies will have to put R&D overseas."

•  Speaking of foreign lands, the government-to-university-to-private sector triumvirate (the government provides grants, universities invent stuff, and the private sector sells it) that helped build the tech industry in the U.S. no longer works as well as it once did. However, they have copied it pretty well overseas.

"They are following the made us successful and here it's broken," he said. "We used to say that what is good for GM is good for America. Now, what is good for the stockholders is not necessarily good for America. That drives me crazy."

Add a Comment (Log in or register) 26 Comments (Page 1 of 2)
by MadLyb January 8, 2008 12:26 PM
Bah! So, what if I can do Terabytes of storage in my house, if all I have is 5 Mbps (At best) to pull it down. The bottleneck is the transport and unless you are fortunate enough to live in are serviced through FTTP (Like FIOS), download HD content is an exercise measured in hours. The other aspect is making that content pervasive. Buy a disk and it is good for years. Buy a digital download and you better have a solid backup strategy. And unlike music, the scale is significantly different. For example it on takes 6 HD movies to burn through the entire storage of an iPod. Not saying it isn't going to happen, just that it is going to take a few years.
Reply to this comment View reply
by emdoller January 8, 2008 12:52 PM
He is right on. If you have terabytes in your house, like I do, you will use it TODAY to store HD movies sent over your current satellite. Dish already allows this and I am filling them up. What I see happening today is you will rent blu-ray's for "first run" movies but use HDD to store what you will watch over your satellite. I see no reason to buy DVD's anymore. The end goal of course is to get HD first run movies into your home and this will take time. Once you watch HD content on 65" plasma 1080P television there is no going back. In fact, the quality of the movie theatre starts to look bad. This will drive solutions. Ed
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
by MyRightEye January 8, 2008 12:56 PM
Ron Paul, come help us...
Reply to this comment
by spiceee January 8, 2008 12:56 PM
The main problem with hard-disks being the repository of HD media bought and wired over the web is that most if not all online movie services don't do re-downloads, because they are seen as an easy way for people to share their accounts online, pay once and download many. I don't have to stress the caveats of hard-disks as storage media, as long as they are mechanical devices they are prone to be defective, and if they go bad (I've had 3 hard-disk failures this year, one of them being a Seagate shipped with my MacBook, btw), there goes your precious movies and you have to pay for them again. At least Blu-ray is a format that is thought-out to be upgradable, TDK is supposedly testing a 200Gb disk.
Reply to this comment View reply
by gsmiller88 January 8, 2008 3:40 PM
So true. The Blu-ray/HD-DVD war is far less significant than the VHS/BetaMax and DVD/Whatever that other one was called wars, because by the time the "winner" is widely adopted, downloads will have taken over. I'm just going to stick with my regular, cheap, DVDs.
Reply to this comment
by Robert G K January 8, 2008 4:16 PM
I think the cloud idea is pretty interesting. I see it more like everything will be on demand. You won't have any of the music, movies or tv on your computer, or player everything will be streamed to you. Your cable/sat/iptv company will keep all the movies and tv shows on their servers and you'll just click on what you want to see and it will be there. Same with music, you'll be able to transfer stuff to your ipod that you virtually bought, but all your albums will be stored on servers by Apple or whoever you use for music. This way you won't have to keep anything, if you switch services (like going from cable to IPTV) you can have your movies follow you like your phone number. You'll just tell the cable company who you're switching with and they'll transfer your account, movies and tv shows with you. I don't even think regular tv will be the same. Instead of having to watch say Heroes at 9pm on NBC, you'll just be able to go to heroes on the guide and it'll show all the episodes and you'll just have to click and watch. This will get rid of DVR's all together. Maybe they will only let you see shows for free a season at a time and then you'll have to buy shows or seasons for the back seasons so they make money like they do when you buy a season of a show on DVD. This will be really streamlined and easy, no need for hard drives, or disks, everything will be at the tip of your fingers. "Flash memory, he added, will never completely take over the hard drive market. The demand for storage is too big. If a flash maker wanted to provide just 15 percent of the world's market for storage in 2012, it would have to invest $50 billion this year alone." This I believe is not true. I think at some point we're going to have to move to flash memory because hard drives are a bottleneck. Nothing goes as fast as the processors now. You have a processor running at 3 Gigs and you have ram running at 800 Mgh, you have PCI express 16x slots and you have serial ATA which I think run at 300mbs, and you have regular PCI which are being phased out it looks like (thank goodness), and you have hard drives...Everything goes slower than the processor. The BIG bottleneck is hard drives, since they spin it takes longer to access your programs which is why OS' take long to load up. I use Uverse for my TV and the OS is based on Wondows CE and it loads in slow because its on a hard drive unlike when you have a cell phone that uses Windows CE it loads in faster because its stored on solid state ram. The problem with ram drives now is price, but once a company develops a cheap form of ram and drives can be made cheaply with the capacity of 300mb or more, then you'll see computers will have ram drives and the OS, programs and games will load in almost instantly. Maybe in a game console you buy a game thats on a ram drive in stead of some kind of disk and load screens will seem almost instant. I'm not sure how long this will be before we get rid of hard drives, maybe 3 years maybe 5, maybe 10, how knows but at some point it'll happen. Maybe solid state drives won't be ram drives, maybe they'll be crystal drives or made out of something else, but I think this is the future. Thats where I think Bill Wilkins is wrong.
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
by sith_killer_99 January 8, 2008 10:39 PM
WOW, this guy is cracked! 1. Internet connections are just too slow to support HD content delivery in a reasonable amount of time. 2. Cost, HDD are not cheap, but optical media will continue to drop in price. Blu-Ray has the ability to go 4 layers deep, probably more, that's 100GB on a single disc minimum. As more discs are produced prices will continue to drop. 3. Storage space, OK great you can now buy a 1TB drive for storage. Now let's do the math. If I have a 25GB movie, I can store up to 40 HD quality movies on a single 1TB drive. If I have a DL-BR sporting 50GB that limits me to just 20 movies on a big heavy, mechanical hard drive. 4. Cost ratio, at $300 plus for a 1TB HDD I can store approx. 30 HD movies, that's $10.00 for worth of storage space. Now if I pay $20.00 for a Blu-Ray disc, which is about what I have paid for each of the 20 or so that I own now, content providers will have to lower the cost of their downloadable HD movie to less than $10.00 for the entire process to be cost effective. 5. Copyrights, RIAA and DRM...these will all be major factors in HD content. Sure, some people like to think that it will all be roses and candy. Just subscribe to X service and buy your movie, no worries. But the truth is that any "service" that sells movies or music online will be more like Apple's iTunes, you buy it, you download it then you better back it up if you want to keep it, otherwise you will have to pay for it again if you lose it due to HDD failure or corruption. The other option is to "rent" downloads which solves the problem of storage space but is excessively restrictive. 6. Flexibility, there is a reason the CD's continue to sell, long after the download revolution has begun. People like to OWN the stuff they buy. They like being able to pop their CD into their home entertainment system, then grab it to take on the road with them, or to a party, or friends house. They also like being able to rip them to their computer and iPod, but more importantly when their computer crashes or become corrupted they like being able to re-rip their CD later. 7. Technology, more specifically the technologically impaired. I know a lot of people making the jump to HD, but they still don't understand how to get a downloaded file to play on their big screen HDTV. Sure to most of us, it's a simple matter, but not everyone understands the process. Add to that the fact that many of these technologically impaired people are still using dial up and you start to get my point. 8. Optical media is the perfect back up solution and it will remain that way, it's durable, high capacity (Blu-Ray) and compact. It also doesn't suffer mechanical failure. 9. "Flash media gets too much attention from wall street" that may be, but do not underestimate the power of flash drives. Flash media has revolutionized the computer industry. I personally own nearly a dozen thumb drives and several flash media cards ranging from 512MB-8GB. I use my thumb drive to transfer data, run portable apps, etc. Flash media cards, such as SD, micro SD, etc. vastly improve the capabilities of many small portable electronic devices such as cell phones, cameras, PDA's and music/media players. This guy sound like a mouth piece for Microsoft pushing digital download movies and programing. It makes me think that perhaps he has a vested interest.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
by emdoller January 9, 2008 7:29 AM
Flash memory market for data storage will expand BUT there is a concept called floor cost that is important when you look at the potential rate of growth. That is, HDD's have a floor cost of ~$50 and once you are willing to pay that you get a whole lot of storage. Flash memory (specifically NAND) has the ability to undercut HDD floor cost. For example, today you can see that a 2GB single NAND memory chip is selling for well under $10. Add a a controller and you have a SSD (solid state drive) for well under $20. So if $20 is all you have to spend flash is it. On the other hand, if all you care about is GB/$ HDD's always win as can get almost a TB for $200. Since we are talking about high definition content, HDD's are the way to go today because each HD movie is 5-10GB and I want to store hundreds. Regarding the comment on Flash being required for speed you need to be careful. Flash is slower, much slower, then HDD when it comes to sustained write rates and flash needs to be erased before writing. Typical flash write rates run 5-10MB/s so I'm not sure I want to store 10GB of data at that data rate. Where flash has a speed advantage over HDD is in the area of initial latency or first access. This is why you are seeing caching applications being used in laptops. Intel has something called turbo memory which uses flash between main memory and the HDD that boosts performance. If you get a chance to see the demo, you will be amazed.
Reply to this comment
by Robert G K January 9, 2008 11:54 AM
You're missing my point all together. When computers first came out we used tape drives, remember those, they were regular audio tapes and they held data, then we went to floppy disks which were faster and held more, then we went to the smaller floppies, which held more. Did we think back then when using dos that we'd be using hard drives that hold gigs of memory? Then I remember a friend of mine had a 5 mb hard drive and I was amazed at this thing, it was fast. Drives got faster and bigger as time went on. Computers use to run on 64k of ram now they run on 2-4+ gigs. Things are changing and as you saw in my post if you read it I'm saying this may not happen in 5 years, maybe 10 or more, but hard drives will be gone. Yes their getting bigger and a little faster, but not much faster. They're getting bigger because their adding more platters because their running into size restraints. The 10,000 RPM of a Western Digital Raptor drive is the fastest we have on serial ATA at the moment and that came out what 3 years ago and still only at 150 GB and its expensive compared to their 7200 rpm drives. It sounds like you guys are thinking the now. Yes we're stuck with hard drives, but like with hard drives ram will get faster and cheaper and/or something else will take its place. Hard drives aren't around forever, you may think I'm nuts but I think I'm right. Now about video. The other night I watched a movie on my Uverse On Demand and I thought this is the way it should be. You pick your movie and you play it, no having to buy a dvd, or rent it or even download it before you play it. You just click on it and play it. It seems thats what the Vudu product is doing and LG is going in with Netflix to do. This I think is the future, you want to own the video you buy it but its saved on their servers. You go over a friends house or hotel you login to your account and watch your movies over there, you want to watch them on your cell phone, just login and watch them. I don't work for MS, I just envision this to be the way things will be. I've been right on other things in the past and I think I'm right here too. Only time will tell.
Reply to this comment
by HowieLynn January 9, 2008 3:17 PM
Hi, Hang in thier gang. Its only a matter of time. If your young enough. I wish I was. It's only a matter of time before someone in China or Vietnam build a BlueRay and HDD DVD recorder with removable Terribyte SATA RAID drives. Someone probably already has. If you don't think so your living in a fairy tale. Sorry about that comment. My advise? Make some chat friends in China and Vietnam. Some year you will get a "happy" chat message from a friend. Customs doesn't check everything that is shipped into the country. Think outside the box!! Howie
Reply to this comment
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software

CES AWARDS AND NOMINEES

Best of CES and People's Voice Award

Since 2006, CNET has presented the Best of CES Awards, given to the top product in 10 categories as well as one coveted Best in Show award. See the gadgets that topped our list for this year, and find out the People's Voice winner, decided by more than 10,000 member votes.

BACKSTAGE CREW

Get a different perspective

CNET Blog Network members plus two lucky international writers offer you their perspectives on what's hot at CES 2008. Find out who they are and which gadgets they find most drool-worthy from the show floor.



Copyright ©2008 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy policy|Terms of use