January 8, 2008 11:20 AM PST

Seagate CEO: Blu-ray won the battle but lost the war

by Michael Kanellos
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 26 comments

LAS VEGAS--The winner in the Blu-ray and HD DVD war is the hard drive, according to Bill Watkins, CEO of Seagate Technology.

"People are saying Blu-ray won the war but who cares? The war is over physical distribution versus electrical distribution, and Blu-ray and HD lost that," he said during a breakfast meeting at the Consumer Electronics Show here this week. "In this, flash memory and hard drives are on the same side. The war is over and the physical guys lost."

Bill Watkins

Bill Watkins

(Credit: Seagate)

Watkins, naturally, speaks from personal interest, but he's got a point. (A former Army grunt and a decades-long Deadhead, Watkins is also one of the more entertaining CEOs in the technology industry to interview.) Consumers haven't been buying Blu-ray or HD DVD players and by the time they do, technology companies will likely be hawking sophisticated on-demand services and Internet Protocol TV. IPTV, in fact, is the dominant theme of the show. Sharp, Samsung, and Panasonic all unfurled content alliances that will let consumers look at headlines or videos from the Net on their TVs.

That's good news for Seagate, because electronic distribution means more hard drive sales. "If (data) is in the cloud I get more storage sales because you have to back up everything," he said.

"Surveillance is a big deal," he added. "You're being filmed right now (we were in a casino) and they've got to store it somewhere."

Hard drive makers are right now living through good times. In the 1990s, excess manufacturing capacity and price cuts led to stagnant revenues and losses for many companies. Since then, many players have dropped out. New markets such as digital video recorders opened up for drive makers. As a result, both Seagate and rival Western Digital are seeing double-digit growth. Seagate has already upped its revenue guidance twice for the quarter that just ended.

And the future continues to look good. Hollywood, Watkins said, will have no choice but to get into home delivery of content in a big way. People are leaving home less and less. And if the movie studios don't deliver their content to their home, people will watch whatever they can find on the Internet. At CES, XStreamHD is showing off a box that gets on-demand movies from a satellite. Actor Michael Douglas is an investor.

"They will watch lousy content if it is easy to do," he said.

Other notes from Watkins:

•  Seagate doesn't have its solid state drive out yet, but it's coming.

•  Flash memory, he added, will never completely take over the hard drive market. The demand for storage is too big. If a flash maker wanted to provide just 15 percent of the world's market for storage in 2012, it would have to invest $50 billion this year alone.

"And right now, no one has made that investment," he said.

He further argued that flash memory gets too much attention from Wall Street. "I'm making 75 cents a quarter, and I get half the valuation of SanDisk or Micron," he added.

•  Consumers still seem buoyant in Europe and Asia, so a lengthy, full-blown global recession may not occur. Admittedly, he adds, that's his own spin.

•  America has got to reform its immigration laws by letting in more immigrants. Nearly 60 percent of the companies in Silicon Valley were founded by people born outside the U.S. Last year, close to 70 percent of the students getting Ph.D.s in engineering were from other countries.

"And none of them got a green card," he said. "Because of this, U.S. companies will have to put R&D overseas."

•  Speaking of foreign lands, the government-to-university-to-private sector triumvirate (the government provides grants, universities invent stuff, and the private sector sells it) that helped build the tech industry in the U.S. no longer works as well as it once did. However, they have copied it pretty well overseas.

"They are following the made us successful and here it's broken," he said. "We used to say that what is good for GM is good for America. Now, what is good for the stockholders is not necessarily good for America. That drives me crazy."

Recent posts from CES 2008
CES 2008: Home audio wrap-up
CES 2008: Home video wrap-up
CES 2008 HDTV wrap-up
Computers and hardware CES 2008 wrap-up
Emerging technologies CES 2008 wrap-up
Car Tech CES 2008 wrap-up
CES 2008: MP3 and PVP wrap-up
Cell phones and smartphones CES 2008 wrap-up
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (26 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
by MadLyb January 8, 2008 12:26 PM PST
Bah!<br /><br />So, what if I can do Terabytes of storage in my house, if all I have is 5 Mbps (At best) to pull it down.<br /><br />The bottleneck is the transport and unless you are fortunate enough to live in are serviced through FTTP (Like FIOS), download HD content is an exercise measured in hours.<br /><br />The other aspect is making that content pervasive. Buy a disk and it is good for years. Buy a digital download and you better have a solid backup strategy. And unlike music, the scale is significantly different. For example it on takes 6 HD movies to burn through the entire storage of an iPod.<br /><br />Not saying it isn't going to happen, just that it is going to take a few years.
Reply to this comment
by lleather January 8, 2008 1:29 PM PST
Uhhh....I have Verizon Fios...35megs up and down all day. I run out of disc space all the time. He is right. Close to a terrabyte of data right now, but I'm certainly what you would call a super user.<br /><br />I'm building out a home entertainment PC right now that will connect my home HD TV to the internet of for watching or listening to video, movies, etc ...even though I also have Direct TV.<br /><br />Their building fiber to the door all over Oregon and other cities now.
by emdoller January 8, 2008 12:52 PM PST
He is right on. If you have terabytes in your house, like I do, you will use it TODAY to store HD movies sent over your current satellite. Dish already allows this and I am filling them up. What I see happening today is you will rent blu-ray's for "first run" movies but use HDD to store what you will watch over your satellite. I see no reason to buy DVD's anymore.<br /><br />The end goal of course is to get HD first run movies into your home and this will take time. Once you watch HD content on 65" plasma 1080P television there is no going back. In fact, the quality of the movie theatre starts to look bad. This will drive solutions.<br /><br />Ed
Reply to this comment
by jrm125 January 9, 2008 10:24 AM PST
are you aware you are in a very very tiny minority technologically
by HowieLynn January 9, 2008 2:31 PM PST
What are you using to store HDD movies in umlimited quantity? Has someone made an HDD recorder with removable SATA drives?<br /><br />If not what are you talking about? Storing 20 movies and HDD shows? That is not very much content now is it. The HDD Network series from DiscoveryHD etc will easily fill that up in a week<br />Please explain,<br />Howie
by MyRightEye January 8, 2008 12:56 PM PST
Ron Paul, come help us...
Reply to this comment
by spiceee January 8, 2008 12:56 PM PST
The main problem with hard-disks being the repository of HD media bought and wired over the web is that most if not all online movie services don't do re-downloads, because they are seen as an easy way for people to share their accounts online, pay once and download many. <br /><br />I don't have to stress the caveats of hard-disks as storage media, as long as they are mechanical devices they are prone to be defective, and if they go bad (I've had 3 hard-disk failures this year, one of them being a Seagate shipped with my MacBook, btw), there goes your precious movies and you have to pay for them again.<br /><br />At least Blu-ray is a format that is thought-out to be upgradable, TDK is supposedly testing a 200Gb disk.
Reply to this comment
by HowieLynn January 9, 2008 3:00 PM PST
Hard drives will last indefinitly with proper use. Otherwise PS3 and TIVO would never have succeded. Let alone the Comcast DVRS which run continuously, continuously, that is. What then kills your PC's hard drive? Well take a hint from Sony's P3 indorsed fan add on. It has three fans. Two blowing in. One blowing out. My Pc, which I built myself with high end components from Intel, Nvidia and Gigabyte, is housed in a state of the art 3rd party case. It supports four removable hard drive bays and two internal SATA Raid bays. I have Eight fans which are hardware monitored. One on each removable drive bay. One for the SATA drives. One on the case side blowing onto the processors for the system and video chips. One blowing out the back of the case. And a thermal controlled powerful power supply fan. And last but not least, thermally controlled fans on the processor chips.<br />If you check the web site of the drive manufacturers they will tell you anything over a 100 degrees F will burn up your drives. In addition I have an external home tower fan sitting on a shelf below a window, for the winter, and in front of an air conditioning vent for the summer. If your system is sitting in a room hot spot or in front of the house heating vent, all the fans in the world won't help keep your system cool. Oh, by the way, if your wondering about cost, my entire system costs less than what you would pay for a comperable system from Dell, HP, or Apple. But them I'm a gammer. I went to shcool, worked my but of at Lockheed Martin in system support for 30 years, and studied really hard. Maybe your not so lucky. But, I tell you what, if you don't mind dealing with some Asian folks, they are still around in store fronts near you home and for a modest fee will help you with all of this.<br />Howie
by gsmiller88 January 8, 2008 3:40 PM PST
So true. The Blu-ray/HD-DVD war is far less significant than the VHS/BetaMax and DVD/Whatever that other one was called wars, because by the time the "winner" is widely adopted, downloads will have taken over. I'm just going to stick with my regular, cheap, DVDs.
Reply to this comment
by Robert G K January 8, 2008 4:16 PM PST
I think the cloud idea is pretty interesting. I see it more like everything will be on demand. You won't have any of the music, movies or tv on your computer, or player everything will be streamed to you. Your cable/sat/iptv company will keep all the movies and tv shows on their servers and you'll just click on what you want to see and it will be there. Same with music, you'll be able to transfer stuff to your ipod that you virtually bought, but all your albums will be stored on servers by Apple or whoever you use for music. This way you won't have to keep anything, if you switch services (like going from cable to IPTV) you can have your movies follow you like your phone number. You'll just tell the cable company who you're switching with and they'll transfer your account, movies and tv shows with you. I don't even think regular tv will be the same. Instead of having to watch say Heroes at 9pm on NBC, you'll just be able to go to heroes on the guide and it'll show all the episodes and you'll just have to click and watch. This will get rid of DVR's all together. Maybe they will only let you see shows for free a season at a time and then you'll have to buy shows or seasons for the back seasons so they make money like they do when you buy a season of a show on DVD. This will be really streamlined and easy, no need for hard drives, or disks, everything will be at the tip of your fingers.<br /><br />"Flash memory, he added, will never completely take over the hard drive market. The demand for storage is too big. If a flash maker wanted to provide just 15 percent of the world's market for storage in 2012, it would have to invest $50 billion this year alone."<br /><br />This I believe is not true. I think at some point we're going to have to move to flash memory because hard drives are a bottleneck. Nothing goes as fast as the processors now. You have a processor running at 3 Gigs and you have ram running at 800 Mgh, you have PCI express 16x slots and you have serial ATA which I think run at 300mbs, and you have regular PCI which are being phased out it looks like (thank goodness), and you have hard drives...Everything goes slower than the processor. The BIG bottleneck is hard drives, since they spin it takes longer to access your programs which is why OS' take long to load up. I use Uverse for my TV and the OS is based on Wondows CE and it loads in slow because its on a hard drive unlike when you have a cell phone that uses Windows CE it loads in faster because its stored on solid state ram. The problem with ram drives now is price, but once a company develops a cheap form of ram and drives can be made cheaply with the capacity of 300mb or more, then you'll see computers will have ram drives and the OS, programs and games will load in almost instantly. Maybe in a game console you buy a game thats on a ram drive in stead of some kind of disk and load screens will seem almost instant. I'm not sure how long this will be before we get rid of hard drives, maybe 3 years maybe 5, maybe 10, how knows but at some point it'll happen. Maybe solid state drives won't be ram drives, maybe they'll be crystal drives or made out of something else, but I think this is the future. Thats where I think Bill Wilkins is wrong.
Reply to this comment
by rodosboy January 8, 2008 5:07 PM PST
Robert, great post! I couldn't agree with you more
by emdoller January 9, 2008 7:23 AM PST
Flash memory market for data storage will expand BUT there is a concept called floor cost that is important when you look at the potential rate of growth. That is, HDD's have a floor cost of ~$50 and once you are willing to pay that you get a whole lot of storage. Flash memory (specifically NAND) has the ability to undercut HDD floor cost. For example, today you can see that a 2GB single NAND memory chip is selling for well under $10. Add a a controller and you have a SSD (solid state drive) for well under $20. So if $20 is all you have to spend flash is it. On the other hand, if all you care about is GB/$ HDD's always win as can get almost a TB for $200.<br /><br />Since we are talking about high definition content, HDD's are the way to go today because each HD movie is 5-10GB and I want to store hundreds.<br /><br />Regarding the comment on Flash being required for speed you need to be careful. Flash is slower, much slower, then HDD when it comes to sustained write rates and flash needs to be erased before writing. Typical flash write rates run 5-10MB/s so I'm not sure I want to store 10GB of data at that data rate. Where flash has a speed advantage over HDD is in the area of initial latency or first access. This is why you are seeing caching applications being used in laptops. Intel has something called turbo memory which uses flash between main memory and the HDD that boosts performance. If you get a chance to see the demo, you will be amazed.
by Robert G K January 10, 2008 1:51 AM PST
I see where you're coming from but I didn't expect hard drives to just vanish in the next year or two. I think it'll take a while and ram may not even be the way to go. Maybe it'll be something else that will take the place of hard drives. I just think in time another technology which will probably be solid state will take the place of hard drives. Right now hard drives are cheap, but when they first came out they were expensive, and only rich people would have a hard drive in their computer, most people used floppies. Times change and in time hard drives are going to have to go bye bye for something faster. If we want instant on computers and programs that access instantly we're going to have to get away from hard drives because as long as hard drives are around we're going to have to wait. I'm just looking at trends and this is the way I see things are going.
by sith_killer_99 January 8, 2008 10:39 PM PST
WOW, this guy is cracked!<br /><br />1. Internet connections are just too slow to support HD content delivery in a reasonable amount of time.<br /><br />2. Cost, HDD are not cheap, but optical media will continue to drop in price. Blu-Ray has the ability to go 4 layers deep, probably more, that's 100GB on a single disc minimum. As more discs are produced prices will continue to drop.<br /><br />3. Storage space, OK great you can now buy a 1TB drive for storage. Now let's do the math. If I have a 25GB movie, I can store up to 40 HD quality movies on a single 1TB drive. If I have a DL-BR sporting 50GB that limits me to just 20 movies on a big heavy, mechanical hard drive.<br /><br />4. Cost ratio, at $300 plus for a 1TB HDD I can store approx. 30 HD movies, that's $10.00 for worth of storage space. Now if I pay $20.00 for a Blu-Ray disc, which is about what I have paid for each of the 20 or so that I own now, content providers will have to lower the cost of their downloadable HD movie to less than $10.00 for the entire process to be cost effective. <br /><br />5. Copyrights, RIAA and DRM...these will all be major factors in HD content. Sure, some people like to think that it will all be roses and candy. Just subscribe to X service and buy your movie, no worries. But the truth is that any "service" that sells movies or music online will be more like Apple's iTunes, you buy it, you download it then you better back it up if you want to keep it, otherwise you will have to pay for it again if you lose it due to HDD failure or corruption. The other option is to "rent" downloads which solves the problem of storage space but is excessively restrictive.<br /><br />6. Flexibility, there is a reason the CD's continue to sell, long after the download revolution has begun. People like to OWN the stuff they buy. They like being able to pop their CD into their home entertainment system, then grab it to take on the road with them, or to a party, or friends house. They also like being able to rip them to their computer and iPod, but more importantly when their computer crashes or become corrupted they like being able to re-rip their CD later.<br /><br />7. Technology, more specifically the technologically impaired. I know a lot of people making the jump to HD, but they still don't understand how to get a downloaded file to play on their big screen HDTV. Sure to most of us, it's a simple matter, but not everyone understands the process. Add to that the fact that many of these technologically impaired people are still using dial up and you start to get my point.<br /><br />8. Optical media is the perfect back up solution and it will remain that way, it's durable, high capacity (Blu-Ray) and compact. It also doesn't suffer mechanical failure.<br /><br />9. "Flash media gets too much attention from wall street" that may be, but do not underestimate the power of flash drives. Flash media has revolutionized the computer industry. I personally own nearly a dozen thumb drives and several flash media cards ranging from 512MB-8GB. I use my thumb drive to transfer data, run portable apps, etc. Flash media cards, such as SD, micro SD, etc. vastly improve the capabilities of many small portable electronic devices such as cell phones, cameras, PDA's and music/media players. <br /><br />This guy sound like a mouth piece for Microsoft pushing digital download movies and programing. It makes me think that perhaps he has a vested interest.
Reply to this comment
by emdoller January 9, 2008 7:27 AM PST
HDD's are expensive? As compared to what? As I wrote, I purchased 750GB disk for my Dish STB for ~$189. Right now i have about 100 HD movies saved on my external 750GB drive. <br /><br />Lets do the math 100 HD movies x $25 Blu-ray disks = $2500<br /><br />Expensive? I think not my friend.<br /><br />Ed
by gerrrg February 18, 2008 4:01 PM PST
Two problems with any issue of costs.<br /><br />1. If you buy into the BluRay, cost is not an issue, unless you're an idiot and you're borrowing money to upgrade everything. So there's no point in arguing that hard drives are more expensive method to storage of movies.<br /><br />2. Cost of storage drops about as fast as the Moore Law, and while you can expect the cost of physical BluRay disks (but not movies) to drop in price, you can expect that any cutting edge format that increases the capacity of the BluRay disk to also be on the leading edge of high cost.<br /><br />The reality is, storage is so cheap and only getting cheaper, that RAID storage is what companies rely on, not BluRay disks. And you cannot, in any possible fashion, compare the versatility of a digital file on a hard drive, to that movie on physical media. I can open up any movie I want to, online, much faster than it takes for the damned DVD player to boot up and read the first billion minutes of warnings, previews and all that crap that comes on a disk.
by emdoller January 9, 2008 7:29 AM PST
Flash memory market for data storage will expand BUT there is a concept called floor cost that is important when you look at the potential rate of growth. That is, HDD's have a floor cost of ~$50 and once you are willing to pay that you get a whole lot of storage. Flash memory (specifically NAND) has the ability to undercut HDD floor cost. For example, today you can see that a 2GB single NAND memory chip is selling for well under $10. Add a a controller and you have a SSD (solid state drive) for well under $20. So if $20 is all you have to spend flash is it. On the other hand, if all you care about is GB/$ HDD's always win as can get almost a TB for $200.<br /><br />Since we are talking about high definition content, HDD's are the way to go today because each HD movie is 5-10GB and I want to store hundreds.<br /><br />Regarding the comment on Flash being required for speed you need to be careful. Flash is slower, much slower, then HDD when it comes to sustained write rates and flash needs to be erased before writing. Typical flash write rates run 5-10MB/s so I'm not sure I want to store 10GB of data at that data rate. Where flash has a speed advantage over HDD is in the area of initial latency or first access. This is why you are seeing caching applications being used in laptops. Intel has something called turbo memory which uses flash between main memory and the HDD that boosts performance. If you get a chance to see the demo, you will be amazed.
Reply to this comment
by Robert G K January 9, 2008 11:54 AM PST
You're missing my point all together. When computers first came out we used tape drives, remember those, they were regular audio tapes and they held data, then we went to floppy disks which were faster and held more, then we went to the smaller floppies, which held more. Did we think back then when using dos that we'd be using hard drives that hold gigs of memory? Then I remember a friend of mine had a 5 mb hard drive and I was amazed at this thing, it was fast. Drives got faster and bigger as time went on. Computers use to run on 64k of ram now they run on 2-4+ gigs. Things are changing and as you saw in my post if you read it I'm saying this may not happen in 5 years, maybe 10 or more, but hard drives will be gone. Yes their getting bigger and a little faster, but not much faster. They're getting bigger because their adding more platters because their running into size restraints. The 10,000 RPM of a Western Digital Raptor drive is the fastest we have on serial ATA at the moment and that came out what 3 years ago and still only at 150 GB and its expensive compared to their 7200 rpm drives.<br /><br />It sounds like you guys are thinking the now. Yes we're stuck with hard drives, but like with hard drives ram will get faster and cheaper and/or something else will take its place. Hard drives aren't around forever, you may think I'm nuts but I think I'm right. <br /><br />Now about video. The other night I watched a movie on my Uverse On Demand and I thought this is the way it should be. You pick your movie and you play it, no having to buy a dvd, or rent it or even download it before you play it. You just click on it and play it. It seems thats what the Vudu product is doing and LG is going in with Netflix to do. This I think is the future, you want to own the video you buy it but its saved on their servers. You go over a friends house or hotel you login to your account and watch your movies over there, you want to watch them on your cell phone, just login and watch them. I don't work for MS, I just envision this to be the way things will be. I've been right on other things in the past and I think I'm right here too. Only time will tell.
Reply to this comment
by HowieLynn January 9, 2008 3:17 PM PST
Hi,<br />Hang in thier gang. Its only a matter of time. If your young enough. I wish I was. It's only a matter of time before someone in China or Vietnam build a BlueRay and HDD DVD recorder with removable Terribyte SATA RAID drives. Someone probably already has. If you don't think so your living in a fairy tale. Sorry about that comment.<br />My advise? Make some chat friends in China and Vietnam. Some year you will get a "happy" chat message from a friend. Customs doesn't check everything that is shipped into the country. Think outside the box!! <br />Howie
Reply to this comment
by MadLyb January 9, 2008 4:06 PM PST
As a follow-on to my previous comment.<br /><br />Transport issues aside for Digital Downloads, let do some basic math.<br /><br />If a typical HD movie is 20 GB, then a Terabyte only gives you 50 movies, so for me to do my current library in HD, it would take 9 TB just to store it, never mind back it up. Since this content is pretty highly compressed already, it will be about 1:1 for backup, so I will need at least 18 TB of storage just to cover what I own today and all this assumes that I do not have any redundancy in this storage (RAID 5), which is extremely foolish.. If you say $150 per drive (about half of current going price), then I have around $2,700 in just disk, add the mechanicals and software to drive this behemoth and you are well in excess of $3K and I haven't bought a single movie yet. Add in the electricity to drive it and that PS3 is looking pretty cheap. ;^)<br /><br />Finally, let's continue to ignore the external transport and look at the just local transport. Even at Gigabit speeds moving a Terabyte isn't exactly a speedy process. Our backup system at work, 'trunks' multiple GigE circuits to handle backups and it still takes hours.<br /><br />The point is, if the industry hasn't developed mechanisms to even handle lossless music distribution, do you think they are ready to begin looking at HD content? This is information management at the Enterprise level, and products in that space cost tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars.<br /><br />Not saying it isn't going to happen...it will. Just not in the next few years unless there is a huge paradigm shift in information transport, storage and management.
Reply to this comment
by Robert G K January 9, 2008 7:44 PM PST
Well I think we'll be streaming movies sooner than later. We already have pay-per-view and On Demand TV. Everything is already set, we just need access to everything. AT&#38;T for example needs to let all their users bring up the guide and see every movie they have on their servers and every show they have saved for a season for say "Heroes". This way everything you want to see is just a few clicks away.<br /><br />I know it'll take a while before we get away from hard drives and move to full solid state drives. I'm guessing about 3-10 years (hopefully closer to 3).
Reply to this comment
by sith_killer_99 January 11, 2008 12:16 AM PST
[QUOTE]Typical flash write rates run 5-10MB/s so I'm not sure I want to store 10GB of data at that data rate[/QUOTE]<br /><br />My Lexar JumpDrive Lightning (thumb drive) has sustained write speeds of 20MB/s. Write speeds for flash memory are getting better all the time, as with any new technology it will take time to become a serious viable option.<br /><br />[QUOTE]HDD's are the way to go today because each HD movie is 5-10GB and I want to store hundreds.[/QUOTE]<br /><br />No, STANDARD DVD's go almost 5-10 GB, an HD DVD/Blu-Ray has anywhere from 15GB - 50GB depending upon the content on the disc, the format it was shot in (shot in HD vs. converted from old non-HD format) and of course the type of disc, HD-DVD has much less space to work with than Blu-Ray.<br /><br />I am personally in the process of backing up many of my standard DVD's to external hard drives and just the standard DVD's are taking up way too much space. Large HDD's are not cheap!
Reply to this comment
by Bradsteratl January 11, 2008 10:17 AM PST
I am going through this exercise too for my standard DVD collection and I was amazed at how quickly you can fill up a TB of space! Even so, having all of my video titles readily available on my Apple TV at the touch of a button is very sweet.
by hazydave January 11, 2008 1:07 PM PST
The problem of storage isn't all THAT simple. Sure, you do expect a hard drive guy to make this claim, and sure, as a video guy, I have my 3TB or so storage locally on the computer. And I actually need most of that storage. Even if I put 1TB up for videos, that's only about 33 films on that disc.. that's an extra $6 per film, assuming that the HD-DVD folks got it right and you only need 30GB per blue DVD (it drops to 20 films, and $10 per, if you go to the Blu-Ray numbers). That's in addition to the content cost, and frankly, I don't see downloads dropping the price so much... only the quality. And we all know that, if a blue disc format does actually hit the threshold of consumer acceptance, it'll eventually cost 25 cents, just as DVDs do today. Sure, HD storage will drop in price, but that'll take more time. <br /><br />Then there's the notion of downloads. Maybe those direct satellite folks have a shot, but most people's networks just aren't up to this. If you have 15Mb/s FIOS, you can get that blu-ray disc downloaded in only 7 hours or less. If you're on basic broadband, though, it's more like 4.6 days per video. If you're on satellite, fugget-aboudit... I get 1.5Mb/s, but only for the first 500MB per day... there's no practical way to get 30-50GB. <br /><br />The other thing to realize is that, while you don't think there's a download limit on your wired FIOS/Cable/DSL, there is. You just never hit it, or enough people never hit it to cause a problem. But if all of a sudden everyone starts downloading 30-50GB videos, you'll find out what the real daily limit for Comcast or Verizon or whomever actually is... they don't have a significant fraction of the total bandwidth to allow this sort of thing on the scale of DVD sales. They won't have that bandwidth in 10 years, barring some new compression scheme that's a huge improvement over H.264. <br /><br />Of course, standard definition stuff isn't a big problem... but you can get that on DVD today. You can a worse version on iTunes, but it's not as if iTunes has stolen the market away from DVD... their big thing has been getting you access to TV shows you had no other way to see (eg, dang, I missed "Lost"... I'll get the download). But with media companies increasingly letting you grab these for free, that's a failing business model. <br /><br />Now, I do believe that eventually, HD video can go the way of music and thrive on HD based players, but that's a long way off. If Blu-Ray wins soon enough, it'll be able to hit critical mass before networks and HDs have a prayer of supporting permanent downloaded video collections. <br />I mean, as with all 5" round shiny things, let this out into the wild of the CE market for a few years, and you'll be see discount BDs for $4.97 at Wal-Mart, players in the discount rack at $19.95, etc... all the things we love about DVD. But the format war precludes that. The only way that downloads get there first is to build a download infrastructure (network, storage, player) that's as good, and really afforable, before Blu-Ray gets there. I can't see that happening. <br /><br />Downloads have changed the music market, but they haven't killed it... yet... and much of that's stupidity on the part of the Record companies. I mean, Wal-Mart sells more music on CD than all of the online download folks put together. And it's not simply a movement to digital players.. I've had RCA, iPod, Philips, Sandisk, and Zune MP3 players.. I buy on CD because of quality and storage... a hard disc crash doesn't trash my collection, and uncompressed 44.1/16 is better than anything they're selling as downloads.. for the same price. <br /><br />And the media companies want both, even though they don't seem to have noticed that allowing downloads of individual songs is what's really killing their business... enough people are buying the one song they like, rather than the album. They won't stop DVD or Blu-Ray because you buy the whole thing, not ala carte. But also, you buy on impulse... you go to your favorite big box store and maybe get a DVD or CD at the same time... you don't just happen upon Amazon or iTunes on the way to the TV section in Best Buy. <br /><br />They're happy to sell downloads, but they know this is going to take a long time. With everyone behind the standard, it took well over a decade to get HDTV to the forefront, and it's still not going 100%. Without a download standard, including servers, delivery, storage, players, the whole infrastructure, that decade-or-so clock hasn't even started yet. I don't doubt that something might catch on, but it's more likely to show up like satellite TV... smaller markers dominated by multiple proprietary formats. If Blu-Ray really wins now, it has plenty of time to establish a foothold before HD-based really kicks in.. and I say this as a guy with consumer experience... my ViP-622 has a nearly full 750GB external HD, and that's just the stuff I haven't had time to watch via timeshift. To match my DVD collection in HD, I'd need 100's of terabytes. And while that might be excessive for many, I'm the guy these first systems will target... techo and video nerd, on my second HDTV (71" DLP), two HDV camcorders, etc. I've just been waiting for the war to end before I get a blue disc player... I would have paid $1000 or so for a Gen1 if there had been only one standard.
Reply to this comment
by rbugtel January 11, 2008 5:27 PM PST
I can see the attraction of downloading movies if you don't care about keeping them. However, I prefer to have media that I can stick in a player. I can tote it with me on a trip, I can stop it in mid-play to resume later if I want, I can share it with friends/family. I think it would be tough to do that with a download. Also, I'm not certain that downloaded movies will have the same quality as a DVD, especially when we get to the sheer volume of data contained in a Blu-Ray or HD-DVD.
Reply to this comment
by markfreeborn January 12, 2008 4:24 PM PST
Wow, so many great comments!!! Makes me wax nostalgic for my first PC, an Apple w/ 8k of ram and yes, the tape interface. I used a $30 Panasonic, but any cheap portable tape recoder worked fine. I started selling Apple in 1979, and at that time a 48K machine, with one floppy (143Kb), and a green screen cost about $2500. The DC Hays Micro Modem was 300 baud. By the time you loaded up the slots (serial Card, parrallel Card, 8K "Pascal card", 80 column card by Videx, Z-80 card by MS and 2 drive controllers for 4 floppies) you had no choice but to hang a fan or two on the beast just to keep power supplies from blowing.<br /><br />My ponit is, some 20 or so PC's later, that it's still a leap frog game. More robust OS and Apps requires faster processing, more RAM, more storage. And we are no longer taking years to develop speed and storage. Turn around time from design to manufacturing is now months... Roll outs for technologies and delivery systems happen almost overnight. As AT&#38;T just did in my old neighborhood in So. Austin (TX) with FIOS. How long will WIMax take?<br />TB drives are just the tip of the iceberg. Sustained 5mb thoughput will seem slow for internet connections. I upgraded my 300K modem to a 1200K modem and was blown away. My four foppies turned into a dual 8in. Lobo drive (anyone remember those?). That got canned for the first external HD, a Tallgrass Technologies 10 Mb (about the same size as an ATX case).<br />OK, get my drift? Last year I bought my 3rd HD screen in as many years. A nice 1080i 50 incher from Panasonic. It will be replaced as soon as OLED's come down in price. And after some 30 plus years of selling this stuff, and yes it just stuff, I have come to realize that the comsumer electronics industry is always about the newer the faster the shinier. Look, whether it's content on your shelf, on your 100 Tb drive, up in the "cloud" what really matters is the content itself. It's not about the gear. The gear is just a means to an end. I have a house full of it. Love to play with toys. But the true enjoyment is what it does, not what it is. So there's my little philosophical rant. Rignt now I have to run out and get another HD for my DVR knowing that in 2-3 years I'll be tossing it into the recycle bin!!!!
Reply to this comment
(26 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
advertisement

CES awards and nominees

Best of CES, 2009

Best of CES 2009 and
People's Voice Award

Since 2006, CNET has presented the Best of CES Awards, given to the top product in 10 categories as well as one coveted Best in Show award. See the gadgets that topped our list for this year, and find out the People's Voice winner, decided by more than 10,000 member votes.

Now accepting submissions for the 2010 Best of CES Awards.

LATEST FROM MACWORLD

Rafe and Josh debate Google's Buzz

Posted by Rafe Needleman, Josh Lowensohn February 9, 2010 6:10 PM PST

Nissan Juke set to debut in New York

Posted by Wayne Cunningham February 9, 2010 5:49 PM PST

Buick LaCrosse surprises with luxury, value

Posted by Wayne Cunningham February 9, 2010 5:37 PM PST
See our full Macworld coverage

RSS FEEDS