January 6, 2008 4:30 PM PST

Sony's $700 dSLR looks like a contender

by Lori Grunin
Sony Alpha DSLR-A200K

Sony Alpha DSLR-A200K

(Credit: Sony Electronics)

Though Sony's Alpha DSLR-A100 currently occupies the price slot of an entry-level dSLR, that's just an accident of time, a midrange model that stayed too long at the party. Sony's first true foray into the entry-level market arrives in the Alpha DSLR-A200, slipping into the market niche currently hogged by the Nikon D40x and Canon EOS Rebel XTi. Preliminary specs include:

  • 10-megapixel, 23.6mm x 15.8mm Super HAD CCD
  • ISO 100 to 3200
  • Super SteadyShot sensor-shift image stabilization
  • 9-point AF sensor with single cross-type sensor in center
  • 40 segment exposure metering system
  • 230,000-pixel 2.7-inch LCD
  • Maximum burst speed 3fps (unlimited JPEG, 3 frames Raw+JPEG, 6 frames Raw)
  • Viewfinder 95 percent coverage, .83x magnification

On one hand, the A200 seems to compare quite favorably to the Nikon and Canon competition--it delivers the same (D40x) or better (XTi) resolution and similar rated performance, but with the added attraction of the in-body stabilization, large LCD and user interface that I liked so much on the A700. But those models have been out in the market for a while already and likely due for a rev any minute now. (Given Nikon and Canon's histories, however, it's unlikely that either update would include in-body image stabilization.)

The $699 DSLR-A200K kit will include the f3.5-5.6 DT 18-70mm lens, while a dual-lens DSLR-A200W kit bundles an additional f4.5-5.6 75-300mm lens for $899. Both will ship in February.

On Sale Now: $498.99 - $499.77
View the latest prices for Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 (with 18-70mm lens)

On Sale Now: $661.08 - $699.99
View the latest prices for Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 (18-70mm and 75-300mm dual lens kit)

Senior Editor Lori Grunin has been covering digital imaging for two decades, but her memory's kind of sketchy on the details. You can hear about it every week on Indecent Exposure, the podcast she co-hosts with Matt Fitzgerald.
Recent posts from CES 2008
CES 2008: Home audio wrap-up
CES 2008: Home video wrap-up
CES 2008 HDTV wrap-up
Computers and hardware CES 2008 wrap-up
Emerging technologies CES 2008 wrap-up
Car Tech CES 2008 wrap-up
CES 2008: MP3 and PVP wrap-up
Cell phones and smartphones CES 2008 wrap-up
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (14 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by eaiman January 9, 2008 7:43 AM PST
The Sony DSLRA200 is more expensive than the DSLRA100 I bought 3 months ago. There seems to be only slight incremental changes (e.g., slightly larger LCD). A selling point for the Sony line of DSLR is the ability to use Minolta Maxxum lenses with no loss of functionality.
Reply to this comment
by Wingnut330 January 9, 2008 10:31 AM PST
What is the difference between this model and the XTi? They seem very similar to me.
Reply to this comment
by thefrizz January 10, 2008 8:03 AM PST
Wingnut,

The major difference is in the image stabilization. Sony's is sensor based, which means you can put an old Minolta lens on the camera (say you find one cheap on eBay or something), and still enjoy the modern luxury of image stabilization.

With the Canon, all stabilization is in the lens, which means you have to buy lenses tha tinclude IS (of VR if you are using the Nikon D40x, which is also a similar camera). When you compare the price of IS and VR lenses to non, you quickly realize how valuable it is to have the stabilization "in body".
by tbcass January 10, 2008 3:47 AM PST
Looks good to me.
Reply to this comment
by Chemstoc January 10, 2008 9:16 AM PST
With Sony's total lack of support for older "media" (SuperDisk) on current operating systems (VISTA) they will not get another DIME of my money no matter how "good" the features. I have two worthless, non-transferable image cameras now, with NO support from Sony to resolve the VISTA issues.
Reply to this comment
by fogfire January 11, 2008 9:14 AM PST
Did Sony ever do SuperDisk? That was a 3M/Imation product with Panasonic doing most of the drives. Vista doesn't support 8 inch floppies either. What did you expect when you bought a bleeding edge format that was in mid format ware with CDr and Zip.
by tbcass January 15, 2008 3:06 AM PST
Sorry you're so mad but super disk is ancient tech. The failure is more Microsoft's than Sony's. I have trashed many products and software over the years when new OS' arrived. I never held it against the manufacturer. That's illogical and like shooting yourself in the foot. I have a Sony A100, the predecessor to this camera. It is a great camera.
by steelerfantex January 23, 2008 9:29 AM PST
Chemstoc,
Can you elaborate more about your issues with Vista. I'm new to the DSLR and am looking at one to buy. i recently bout a new PC with Viasta Home Premium. I wanted to make sure i would have any issues using the camera and my new PC. I'd appreciate the feedback if you have a sec. thanks!
by Sterlingward January 11, 2008 6:32 AM PST
I already own the DSLRA100, from reviewing the specs on the 200, it appears to not have gained much. I also own 2 of the Canon series DSLR, and Sony still has some work to do in my opinion to rival Canon, even at this price range. Originally, I only purchased the Sony A100 becuase I was a Minolta user, and had much glass and flashes. But, even with all of the glass that works well with the A100, I still changed to the Canon line for better performance.
Reply to this comment
by fogfire January 11, 2008 9:02 AM PST
So lets see.. Same Price as a dated XTi.
Included Wireless flash control.. (add $160+ to Cost of Canon)
Stabilization on ALL lenses
Better Kit Lens than Canon
Sport Metering the Canon doesn't have
Dynamic Range Optimizer (Canon doesn't have)
Easier User Interface to control the camera.
And Auto bracketing that the Nikon D40x doesn't have

Ya I guess your right it doesn't quite match up.. because the paint used to write the Canon name on the front is more important that photography features ...
Simple if anyone wants to buy an entry level camera on features and ability they should look at Canon and Nikon last because they remove features that Sony, Pentax, and Olympus give you in the same range.
by tbcass January 15, 2008 3:14 AM PST
Actually when I compared the A100 to the XTi I found the Sony to be a better over all camera. With a better kit lens, in body IS, much better handling and interface and a seemingly better build quality I felt the A100 trumped the XTi's slightly better iso 1600 jpg noise characteristics. For the very few times I need iso 1600 I shoot RAW and process with noise reduction software for results every bit as good as Canon. Add to that better IQ at iso 100 & 200, which I use 90% of the time, and it was a no brainer. PS, I've been using SLR type cameras for 37 years.
by billy Campbell1 January 11, 2008 8:11 AM PST
It l looks as if the 200 has addressed (on paper at least) the low light high iso noise issue shared by D40x and xti . But it is al speculation until the 200 gets in the hands of the user
Reply to this comment
by tbcass January 15, 2008 3:19 AM PST
While the A100 had more iso 1600 noise than those it produced sharper images. If Sony uses more noise reduction it has to result in less sharpness. There's no free lunch.
by pavpare January 15, 2008 10:23 AM PST
Very very perfect,and I wish to have one of this SONY CAMERA'S product as soon as possible.
Reply to this comment
(14 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

CES awards and nominees

Best of CES, 2009

Best of CES and People's Voice Award

Since 2006, CNET has presented the Best of CES Awards, given to the top product in 10 categories as well as one coveted Best in Show award. See the gadgets that topped our list for this year, and find out the People's Voice winner, decided by more than 10,000 member votes.

LATEST FROM MACWORLD

At 2,000 miles, Road Trip 2009 heads to America's largest bombing range

Posted by Daniel Terdiman July 4, 2009 6:00 AM PDT

Oppo's affordabe high-end Blu-ray player is here

Posted by David Carnoy July 4, 2009 5:23 AM PDT
See our full Macworld coverage

RSS FEEDS