January 5, 2008 4:00 PM PST

Logitech's Squeezebox Duet: Sonos for the masses?

Logitech Squeezebox Duet

Logitech Squeezebox Duet: Music streaming meets superior ergonomics.

(Credit: Logitech)

Digital audio is great--especially if you've got a multigigabyte music collection sitting on your computer or you subscribe to an "all you can eat" music service like Rhapsody. The problem, for a lot of people, is that they're stuck listening to all that great music on the tinny speakers of their computer--or perhaps patching the laptop into their living room stereo system. Dedicated audio streamers have helped somewhat, but they have tiny little screens, which--like docked iPods--aren't very useful if you're sitting on a sofa across the room. And the best solution to date--the excellent Sonos Digital Music System--costs a prohibitive $1,000. Enter Logitech's new Squeezebox Duet: the $400 network digital audio streamer employs a winning handheld remote with a brilliant color screen (not unlike an iPod) that lets you navigate your entire music collection--including some online services and the majority of free Internet radio stations--from the palm of your hand, even while you hear the music from the big speakers of your home stereo.

The Duet is so named because it's a two-part system: a base station and the remote. The base station is a nondescript black brick that pulls audio from a networked PC or the Internet via your Wi-Fi or Ethernet home network, and outputs to your stereo from its analog or digital (coaxial or optical) jacks. But the real innovation is the remote: beyond the ten buttons controlling standard functions (volume, play/pause, track forward/reverse), it features an iPod-like scrollwheel and a brilliant 2.4-inch color LCD screen. That puts the song navigation where it belongs: in your hand, instead of a small LCD readout halfway across the room. (A charging cradle for the remote is also provided, so it can juice up while not in use.)

Aside from the much improved ergonomics and design, the Duet keeps much of the same under-the-hood technology found in earlier Squeezebox music streamers. That means it's compatible with nearly every non-DRM file format under the sun (including audiophile faves Apple Lossless, WMA Lossless, and FLAC) as well as free Internet radio stations and paid subscription online music services such as Rhapsody and Pandora. Logitech is also working to ensure that the Duet will also be backwards compatible with earlier Squeezebox models--meaning they can act as base stations in additional rooms (listening to the same music or other streams) and still interact with the Duet remote. Likewise, the latest Squeezebox will still adhere to the company's open-source roots: in addition to running a new and improved version of the open-source SlimServer music manager, the company expects to incorporate community-based improvements into the unit via its upgradable firmware.

Logitech provided a behind-closed-doors demo of the Squeezebox Duet to CNET a few weeks ago, and we liked what we saw. It's a solid upgrade of the Logitech Wireless DJ concept, turbocharged with the superior networking, software, and audio expertise found in earlier Squeezebox models. We'll reserve final judgment until we get a production model for review, but--as first impressions go--the Duet has all the makings of a winner. At the very least, it looks to be a strong alternative to the Sonos Digital Music System, delivering a similar experience--a network music player with a superior handheld remote--for hundreds less than the Sonos, which has long been the king of the hill in the still nascent product category.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) 48 Comments (Page 1 of 3)
by davis.scott January 6, 2008 11:29 AM
While the Sonos may cost $1000 for a bundled package, this will give you a Remote, and Base Stations for 2 rooms. It looks like the Duet gives you only one room for $400. Double that for two rooms to make it more similar to the Sonos, and now you are up to $800. And the $1000 Sonos bundle comes with one powered base station, so that room would not need an additional amplifier/stereo system. Still seems like the Sonos might be a better deal overall....
Reply to this comment View all 5 replies
by mgason January 7, 2008 12:10 PM
they should bring out a duet with a simple stereo amp
Reply to this comment
by MikeC January 9, 2008 7:55 AM
You can buy a good amp anywhere. Why tie it into a product? It is smarter to let people use their existing amp or get their own like Logitech is doing.
Reply to this comment
by xingzxx123 January 9, 2008 4:22 PM
i like it...
Reply to this comment
by Chris2395 January 9, 2008 4:31 PM
Doesn't look like it supports NAS which means the PC would have to be on to access music, what's that cost $20 to $30 a month? Sonos gives you NAS access as well as the amp in the 100. In the long run an overall better value it seems.
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
by SuperEnchi January 10, 2008 12:28 AM
The Squeezebox Controller (the remote part) will work with any of their hardware.... right now.
Reply to this comment
by rydertaylor January 10, 2008 7:05 AM
I'm a big Squeezebox fan, but the Neosonik Wireless Home Theater is cutting edge and should have been your winner in the audio category. Do we really need a another expensive remote in our lives?????
Reply to this comment View reply
by moretroops January 10, 2008 8:43 AM
The problem with streaming from your computer wirelessly is that you lose a ton of fidelity. So if you're goal is to play your digital music on big speakers with (presumably) better sound, that goal is not well served.

Get the Keyspan Tuneview. Great solution. You get the remote w/readout, but the ipod is actually connected to the stereo, sound isn't streamed.
Reply to this comment View all 4 replies
by zepoloo January 10, 2008 7:38 PM
Looks like additional receivers can be purchased separately for a suggested retail price of $149.99. So to construct the same Sonos package would be $550. Maybe just the thing to put a little pressure on Sonos' prices, which have not budged in a long time. Go competition!
Reply to this comment
by fmcgillin January 11, 2008 8:49 AM
Lower price is a good feature, but seperate amp with this unit means you either need to monkey with two remotes (one for amp one for squeezebox) or leave your amp on all the time. I would still go for Sonos
Reply to this comment View reply
1 | 2 | 3 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software

CES AWARDS AND NOMINEES

Best of CES and People's Voice Award

Since 2006, CNET has presented the Best of CES Awards, given to the top product in 10 categories as well as one coveted Best in Show award. See the gadgets that topped our list for this year, and find out the People's Voice winner, decided by more than 10,000 member votes.

BACKSTAGE CREW

Get a different perspective

CNET Blog Network members plus two lucky international writers offer you their perspectives on what's hot at CES 2008. Find out who they are and which gadgets they find most drool-worthy from the show floor.



Copyright ©2008 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy policy|Terms of use